Chicago IP Litigation

Tracking Northern District of Illinois IP Cases

Subscribe
Visit Blog
By: R. David Donoghue

Blog Authors

R. David Donoghue

Latest from Chicago IP Litigation

Easton v. Primal Wear, Inc., No. 17 C 6081, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 29, 2019) (Tharp, J.). Judge Tharp denied the plaintiffs’ (collectively “Primal Mode”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment and defendant Primal Wear’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & (6) motion to dismiss in this Lanham Act trademark infringement and unfair competition case involving Primal Mode’s PRIMAL MODE marks and Primal Wear’s PRIMAL and PRIMAL WEAR marks. Of particular note, the Court held as follows: Primal Wear did not meet its burden of proving that Primal Mode abandoned its mark by not having sold…
Quan v. Ty, Inc., No. 17 C 5683, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 20, 2019) (Kennelly, J.). Judge Kennelly denied defendant Ty’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment as to equitable estoppel and abandonment regarding plaintiffs’ patent and copyright infringement claims regarding a plush seal that Ty marketed as “Wiggy.” Of particular note, the Court held as follows: The fact that Ty eventually learned of plaintiffs’ copyrights, at least when the Chinese government seized a shipment of Ty’s goods, does not mean that Ty knew about the alleged rights at the time of manufacture. The Court held…
VitalGo, Inc. v. Kreg Therapeutics, Inc., No. 16 C 5577, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 27, 2019) (Dow, J.). Judge Dow granted in part defendant Kerg’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) & 12(f) motion to strike portions of plaintiff VitalGo’s Second Amended Complaint (SAC) and to dismiss VitalGo’s claims with prejudice in this Lanham Act and copyright case related to Kreg’s Catalyst Lift Bed products. Of particular note, the Court held as follows: The Court struck those portions of VitalGo’s SAC that related to the Total Lift Bed, not Kreg’s Catalyst Lift Bed. The Court previously dismissed the claims related…
Fair Isaac Corp. v. Trans Union, LLC, No. 17 C 8318, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 27, 2019) (Coleman, J.). Judge Coleman granted in part defendant Trans Union’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff FICO’s amended complaint and denied Trans Union’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) alternative motion for a more definite statement in this antitrust, Lanham Act unfair trade practices and related state law claims involving FICO’s credit score algorithms Of particular note, the Court held as follows: FICO’s breach of contract claims survived because they identified a purported contractual duty and that Trans Union alleged…
Fair Isaac Corp. v. Trans Union, LLC, No. 17 C 8318, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 27, 2019) (Coleman, J.). Judge Coleman granted in part plaintiff FICO’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss defendant Trans Union’s counterclaims in this antitrust, Lanham Act unfair trade practices and related state law claims involving FICO’s credit score algorithms. Of particular note, the Court held as follows: Trans Union sufficiently pled its antitrust claims. Trans Union alleged that FICO engaged in practices intended to drive out competition and that FICO’s exclusive dealings are allegedly unlawful attempts to maintain monopoly power. The Court…
Upaid Sys., Ltd. v. Card Concepts, Inc., No. 17 C 8150, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 25, 2019) (Feinerman, J.). Judge Feinerman denied defendant Card Concepts’ (CCI) Fed. R. Civ. P. motion for judgment on the pleadings that the patent claims are invalid as unpatentable subject matter pursuant to §101 in this patent case involving systems for collecting payments across different networks, particularly for laundromat systems. Citing Aatrix and looking to the patent’s specification and the complaint, the Court held that the patent and plaintiff Upaid’s complaint identified the development of the patented invention and the improvements over the prior…
Malibu Media, LLC v. Khan, No. 18 C 3028, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 27, 2019) (Leinenweber, J.). Judge Leinenweber granted in part plaintiff Malibu Media’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss individual defendants’ declaratory judgment copyright and copyright misuse claims in this BitTorrent case involving use and sharing of pornographic video files. The Court referenced the “deluge” of Malibu Media cases it has seen over the last several years against named and Doe individuals for allegedly using BitTorrent to download and share pornographic movies. The Court held that it would not dismiss defendant’s declaratory judgment copyright noninfringement…
Beckman Coulter, Inc. v. Sysmex Am., Inc., No. 18 C 6563, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Apr. 26, 2019) (Rowland, Mag. J.). Magistrate Judge Rowland granted in part defendants’ (collectively “Sysmex”) motion to compel more definite responses regarding plaintiff Beckman Coulter’s dates of conception and reduction to practice in this patent case involving automated software for testing specimens. The Court held that Beckman Coulter had the burden of establishing its conception and reduction to practice and dates of conception and reduction to practice were material to Sysmex’s invalidity defenses. The Court held that Sysmex had to provide “actual or approximate specific…
Flair Airlines, Inc. v Gregor LLC, No. 18 C 2023, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Apr. 3, 2019) (Guzman, J.). Judge Guzman adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations (R&R), denying defendants’ motion to dismiss and for sanctions based upon defendant’s alleged spoliation of evidence from plaintiff Flair Airlines’ computer systems. The Court adopted the magistrate’s reasoning that defendants’ claimed spoliation was based upon speculation and that defendants’ lacked direct proof of intentional destruction of evidence. The alleged spoliation was based upon deletion of terminated customer account information. But Flair testified that it routinely deleted such information after a customer terminated…
Malibu Media, LLC v. Palella, No. 18 C 3041, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Apr. 12, 2019) (Lee, J.). Judge Lee denied defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff Malibu Media’s claims because it improperly relied upon an IP address in order to identify defendant in this BitTorrent copyright infringement action regarding adult movies. Defendant argued that his IP address was not a sufficient nexus to name him in Malibu Media’s suit, explaining that defendant was not in his home at a number of the times that the alleged contact with the IP address occurred and that it…
Next Level SportSystems, Inc. v. S&S Activewear, LLC, et al., No. 18 C 5926, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 7, 2019) (Durkin, J.). Judge Durkin granted defendant YS Garments LLC’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7) motion to dismiss for failure to join Sierra Sportswear, Inc., the co-owner of plaintiff Next Level’s trademark-in-suit as a necessary or indispensable party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 19. Next Level argued that it adequately protected Sierra’s interest in the suit, but regardless of whether that was true, the action could still “impair or impede” Sierra’s interest, in particular if the trademark were invalidated.…
GC2 Inc. v. Int’l Game Tech., No. 16 C 8784, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Nov. 12, 2018) (Kennelly, J.). Judge Kennelly granted in part defendants’ (collectively IGT) Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff GC2’s “Kitty Glitter” and “Maid of Money” games, to limit GC2’s recovery of profits and on GC2’s Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) and Illinois Consumer Fraud Act (ICFA) claims in this case involving video slot machines. Of particular note, the Court held as follows: While IGT may have copied something from GC2’s Kitty Glitter game, that something was not protectable. No…
Peerless Indus., Inc. v. Crimson AV, LLC, No. 11 C 1768, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Nov. 27, 2018) (Lefkow, J.). After a patent infringement jury trial in June 2016, and a stipulation of judgment and damages in the amount of $40,000, the parties agreed to a stay of execution until Judge Lefkow ruled on all post-trial motions. The Court denied defendant Crimson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law as to its inequitable conduct defense in this patent dispute regarding mounting brackets for flat-screen televisions. As an initial matter, Rule 50 did not…
The Northern District of Illinois has amended Local Rule 5.8 (Filing Materials Under Seal) to require that all documents filed either by counsel or a non-represented party with an e-filing account be filed electronically pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, unless the Court has held that the documents need not be filed electronically pursuant to Local Rule 26.2(d). Local Rule 26.2 requires that documents only be filed under seal where the party has a Court order sealing the document or where the party contemporaneously files a motion to seal. Local Rule 26.2(c). In the latter case, a party must contemporaneously:…
By: Anthony J Fuga|Taite R McDonald|Michael Obeiter The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado on April 17, 2019, upheld United Cannabis Corp.’s (UCANN) patent claims concerning a liquid cannabinoid formulation, “wherein at least 95% of the total cannabinoids is a specified cannabinoid or combination of them.”1 Pure Hemp challenged the claims in an early motion for summary judgment, arguing that UCANN’s claims are directed to “the unpatentable natural phenomenon of the specified chemical compounds (cannabinoids, terpenes, and flavonoids), as if UCANN is trying to secure a monopoly on those compounds.” The court walked…
Kenall Mfg. Co. v. Cooper Lighting, LLC, No. 17 C 4575, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Dec. 10, 2018) (Feinerman, J.). Judge Feinerman granted in part plaintiff  Kenall’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) motion to strike defendants’ (collectively “Cooper”) affirmative defenses and denied Kenall’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for partial judgment on the pleadings as to liability in this patent and breach of contract case regarding modular light fixtures. After Kenall filed a first patent infringement suit, the parties settled their dispute in which Kenall waived its infringement claims for products manufactured and sold before the agreement’s effective date.…