Earlier this month, the Sixth Circuit issued a decision in Bivens v. Zep that significantly narrows when an employer can be held liable under Title VII for harassment committed by a third party, such as a customer or client. The court held that an employer may only be liable in this scenario if the employer intended for the harassment to occur. This ruling departs from the EEOC’s longstanding interpretation of Title VII as well as from the majority of other federal appeals courts that have considered the issue.
