In a recent per curiam decision, the Texas Supreme Court reversed a court of appeals decision holding that an insured’s claims under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act (“TPPCA”) and for statutory and common law bad faith were barred by the payment under a unilateral appraisal clause. Steven Biasatti and Paul Gross d/b/a TopDog Properties v. GuideOne Insurance Company, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2020 WL 1898538, No. 18-0911 (Tex. April 17, 2020).

In TopDog, the insured made a claim for wind and hail damage, which its insurer, GuideOne, denied after two inspections, determined that the value of the loss fell below the policy’s $5,000 deductible. The insured then requested an appraisal, but GuideOne refused based on the policy’s unilateral appraisal provision. That provision stated: “If the Named Insured and the Company fail to agree on the amount of the loss, the Company can demand that the amount of the loss be set by appraisal.”

TopDog then sued GuideOne for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of TPPCA. In the course of the litigation, the loss was appraised at $168,808. GuideOne paid the appraised amount, less the deductible and depreciation and the parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment to GuideOne based on the payment of the appraisal award, which the appellate court affirmed.

While on appeal, the Texas Supreme Court decided Barbara
Technologies Corp. v. State Farm Lloyds
, 589 S.W.3d 806 (Tex. 2019) (payment
of the appraised amount does not foreclose a TPPCA claim) and Ortiz v. State
Farm Lloyds
, 589 S.W.3d 127 (Tex. 2019) (payment of the appraised amount
bars common law and statutory bad faith claims absent proof of independent
injury). Applying Barbara Technologies, the supreme court reversed the
appellate court’s ruling on TopDog’s TPPCA claim. As to its bad faith claims, Top
Dog argued that the court should recognize an exception to the requirement of “independent
injury” where the policy contains a unilateral appraisal clause. The court
rejected the invitation to create an exception to Ortiz, and reversed the
appellate court’s to permit Top Dog the ability to present evidence of
independent injury.

Thus, in the context of TPPCA and bad faith disputes overpaid appraised losses, the Texas Supreme Court reaffirmed the application of its 2019 decisions in Barbara Technologies and Ortiz.

For more information, contact Tressler attorney Tom Donofrio at

The post The Texas Supreme Court Declines Invitation to Drop Ortiz Independent Injury Requirement in Unilateral Appraisal Case appeared first on Bad Faith Bulletin.