The President contends that the Account is exclusively a vehicle for his own speech to whichthe Individual Plaintiffs have no right of access and to which the First Amendment does not apply. Secondarily, he argues that, in any event, the Account is not a public forum and that even if the Account were a public forum blocking the Individual Plaintiffs did not prevent them from accessing the forum.The President further argues that, to the extent the Account is government– controlled, posts on it are government speech to which the First Amendment does not apply. We are not persuaded. We conclude that the evidence of theofficial nature of the Account is overwhelming. We also conclude that once the President has chosen a platform and opened up its interactive space to millions of users and participants, he may not selectively exclude those whose views hedisagrees with.
BREAKING: Second Circuit Decides Trump Twitter Appeal
We have previously reported on the lawsuit filed against President Trump to challenge his blocking of users from his Twitter account, which the users argued violated their First Amendment rights. The federal district court ruled in their favor, finding (1) that President Trump’s @realDonaldTrump account was a public forum subject to the First Amendment and (2) that his actions in blocking users from that account violated the First Amendment rights of those blocked users.
The President appealed that ruling to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. This morning, the Second Circuit issued its opinion in this appeal, upholding the district court’s ruling that the President’s actions in blocking critics from his @realDonaldTrump Twitter account violated the First Amendment. Specifically, the Second Circuit stated as follows:
This opinion, like the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling last year finding a County Commissioner’s personal Facebook page to be subject to the First Amendment, is an important one for local government officials who use their personal social media sites to communicate about government business. In certain circumstances, those personal pages and accounts may be so intertwined with government business that they are considered a “public forum,” meaning that the government official must be careful not to censor the speech of those who post on these pages and accounts.
You can read the Second Circuit’s decision Knight First Amendment Institute v. Donald J. Trump here.