March patent filings saw a slight uptick from the first months of the year. Frequent filers included Express Mobile, Geographic Location Innovations, Hawk Technology, Internet Media Interactive, Lupercal and Landmark Technology.
As usual, I prepared the report in partnership with and using Docket Navigator and its powerful database. Docket Navigator is a valuable resource, and the place to go if you want to keep track of new patent litigation filings or want to know what is happening in particular cases, how your judge has historically handled a particular type of motion, or a particular plaintiff’s litigation history. Finally, please let me know if you have thoughts about the report or changes you would like to see. I am preparing it as a service for retailers and their supply chain who may want an overview of the patent litigation landscape. So, I am very open to your suggestions for improving the report.
Dyfan, LLC v. Target Corporation (W.D. Tex.).
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Dyfan, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Toler Law Group
Patents: 10,194,292 (System for location based triggers for mobile devices); 9,973,899 (System for location based triggers for mobile devices)
Shopify Inc. et al v. Express Mobile, Inc. (D. Del).
Claims: Declaratory Judgment; Infringement
Defendant: Express Mobile, Inc.
Plaintiffs:
- Shopify (USA) Inc.
- Shopify Inc.
Pls. Cnsl: Durie Tangri; McCarter & English
Patents: 6,546,397 (Browser based web site generation tool and run time engine); 7,594,168 (Browser based web site generation tool and run time engine); 9,063,755 (Systems and methods for presenting information on mobile devices); 9,471,287 (Systems and methods for integrating widgets on mobile devices)
Internet Media Interactive Corp. v. Moen Incorporated (D. Del).
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: Moen Incorporated
Plaintiff: Internet Media Interactive Corp.
Pls. Cnsl: O’Kelly Ernst & Joyce; Haller Law
Patent: 6,049,835 (System for providing easy access to the World Wide Web utilizing a published list of preselected Internet locations together with their unique multi-digit jump codes)
Landmark Technology A, LLC v. Specialty Bottle, Inc. et al. (W.D. Wash.).
Judge: Magistrate Judge Mary Alice Theiler
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- Specialty Bottle, Inc.
- Specialty Bottle Supply, LLC
Plaintiff: Landmark Technology A, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Banie & Ishimoto
Patent: 7,010,508 (Automated multimedia data processing network)
Blackbird Tech LLC d/b/a Blackbird Technologies v. HSBC Bank USA, NA (D. Del.).
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, NA
Plaintiff: Blackbird Tech LLC d/b/a Blackbird Technologies
Pls. Cnsl: Stamoulis & Weinblatt; Blackbird Tech LLC
Patents: 7,958,214 (Method for secure transactions utilizing physically separated computers); 8,285,832 (Method for secure transactions utilizing physically separated computers) 9,424,848 (Method for secure transactions utilizing physically separated computers)
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. JetBlue Airways Corporation (N.D. Tex.).
Judge: District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: JetBlue Airways Corporation
Plaintiff: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Kizzia Johnson
Patent: RE43462 (Video monitoring and conferencing system)
Lupercal LLC v. Citibank, NA, et al. (W.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- Citibank, NA
- PlainsCapital Bank
Plaintiff: Lupercal LLC
Pls. Cnsl: The Mort Law Firm
Patent: 9,386,094 (System, method and apparatus for media submission)
Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. The Talbots, Inc. (E.D. Tex.).
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: The Talbots, Inc.
Plaintiff: Geographic Location Innovations LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Kizzia Johnson
Patent: 7,917,285 (Device, system and method for remotely entering, storing and sharing addresses for a positional information device)
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- com, Inc.
- eBay Inc.
- Etsy, Inc.
- com, Inc.
- Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff: Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Devlin Law Firm
Patents: 8,374,956 (Internet transactions based on user-specific information); 8,396,743 (Sending targeted product offerings based on personal information); 8,533,047 (Internet business transaction processor); 8,712,846 (Sending targeted product offerings based on personal information); 8,775,255 (Internet business transaction processor)
Secure Cam, LLC v. Hill-Rom Company, Inc. (N.D. Ill.).
Judge: District Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Secure Cam, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Rabicoff Law
Patent: 7,257,158 (System for transmitting video images over a computer network to a remote receiver)
First-Class Monitoring, LLC v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (E.D. Tex.).
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Plaintiff: First-Class Monitoring, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Stamoulis & Weinblatt
Patent: 6,014,089 (Method for transmitting data using a digital control channel of a wireless network)